A caricatura gráfica e o ethos popular em Pompéia

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24277/classica.v0i0.823

Palavras-chave:

caricatura, cultura popular, Pompéia, cultura romana, grafismo.

Resumo

A partir do popular e do satírico, busca-se a definição do ethos popular em Pompéia. Parte-se de uma análise da cultura popular na sociedade antiga, ressaltando-se a sátira e a caricatura como formas expressivas especificamente populares. O simbolismo estilístico presente no grafismo parietal pompeiano é estudado em contraposiçáo às expressões eruditas (carmina figurata). Caracteriza-se o sistema sócio-semiótico das caricaturas pompeianas chegando-se à especificidade do ethos popular.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

ADAMS, J. N. The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. Londres: Duckworth, 1987.

BATTISTI, C. Avviamento alto studio del latino volgare. Bari: Leonardo da Vinci Editrice, 1949.

BAKHTINE M. L’oeuvre de François Rabelais et la culture populaire du Moyen-Age et sous la Renaissance. Paris: Gallimard, 1970.

BERGSON, H. Le rire. Essai sur la signification du comique. Paris: PUF, 1940.

BIANCHI-BANDINELLI, R. Archeologia e cultura. Milão: Ricciardi, 1961.

BIANCHI-BANDINELLI, R. Rome, the centre of the power. Roman art to AD 200. Londres: Thames & Hudson, 1970.

BIANCHI-BANDINELLI, R. Del Helenismo a la Edad Media. Madri: Akal, 1981.

BLACKBURN, R. Fin de siecle: socialism after the crash, New Left Review, v. 185, p. 5-67, 1991.

BRENDEL, O. J. Prolegomena to the study of Roman Art. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979.

BROWNE, R. B. Redefining literature. Journal of Popular Culture, v. 23, n. 3, p. 11-21, 1989.

BRUNT, P. A. Schiavi e classi subalterna nella comunità romano-italica. In: AA.VV. Storia della Società Italiana. Milão: Teti, 1983. v. 2, p. 95-132.

BULFORD A. Craftsmen in Greek and Roman Society. Londres: Duckkworth, 1972.

BURKE, P. The historical anthropology of early modern Italy. Essays on perception and communication. Cambridge: CUP, 1989a.

BURKE, P. A cultura popular na Idade Moderna. São Paulo: Cia das Letras, 1989b.

CANDIDO, A. Literatura e Sociedade. São Paulo: Cia Ed. Nacional, 1976.

CÉBE, J. P. La caricature et la parodie dans te monde romain antique des origines à Juvenal. Paris: de Boccard, 1966.

CRESPO, A.; BEDATE P. G. Situación de la poesia concreta. Revista de Cultura Brasileira, 5, p. 15-35, 1963.

CROCE, B. Poesia, storia. Pagine tratta da tutte te opere a cura dell’autore. Nápoles: Ricciardi, [s.d.].

DAVIS, W. Style and history in art history. In: CONKEY M.; HASTORF, C. (ed.). The uses of style in Archaeology. Cambridge: CUP, 1990. p. 18-31.

DELLA CORTE, M. Pompei. Le iscrizioni della Grande Palestra ad occidente dell’Anfiteatro. Notizie degli Scavi di Antichità, v. 64, p. 293, 1939.

DELLA CORTE, M. Case ed abitanti di Pompeii. Roma: L’Erma, 1954.

DENTZER, J. M. La tombe de C. Vestoirius dans la tradition de la Peinture italique. Mélanges de l’Ecole Française de Rome, v. 74, p. 533-594, 1962.

DE MARTINO, F. Nuovi studi di economia e diritto romano. Roma: Riuniti, 1988.

DÍAZ, M. E. The satiric penny pen press for workers in Mexico, 1900-1910: a case study in the politicisation of popular culture. Journal of Latin American Studies, v. 22, n. 3, p. 497-526, 1990.

FOUCAULT, M. The care of the self. The history of sexuality. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1986. v. 3.

FREUDENBURG, K. Horace’s satiric program and the language of contemporary theory in Satires, 2, 1. American Journal of Philology, v. 111, n. 2, p. 187-203, 1990.

FUNARI, P. P. A. Cultura(s) dominante(s) e cultura(s) subalterna(s) em Pompéia: da vertical da cidade ao horizonte do possível. Revista Brasileira de História, v. 7, p. 33-48, 1987.

FUNARI, P. P. A. Cultura popular na Antigüidade Clássica. São Paulo: Contexto, 1989.

GICHON, M. Who were the enemies of Rome on the Limes Palestinae. Studien zu den Militaergrenzen Roms III, Aalen: 13. Internationaler Lemeskongress, 1983. p. 584-592.

GIGANTE, M. Civiltà delle forme letterarie nell’antica Pompeii. Nápoles: Bibliopoli, 1979.

GOMRINGEN, E. Konstellationen. Frankfurt: [s.n.], 1953.

GOLBY, J. M.; PURDUE, A. W. The civilization of the crowd. Popular cultures in England 1750-1900. Londres: Batsford, 1984.

GUILLEMAN, Mlle A. Compte-rendu, Révue des Etudes Latines, v. 13, p. 404-406, 1935.

GUINSBURG, C. An interview to Keith Luria e Romulo Gandolfo. Radical History Review, v. 39, p. 89-111, 1986.

HAHN, I. Klassengebundheit, Tendenz und Anspruch auf Objektivitaet der Antiken Geschichtsschreibung. In: AFONSO-NUNES, J. M. (ed.). Geschichtsbild und Geschichtsdenken im Affertum. Darmstad: W. B., 1991. p. 363-405. •

HAEBERLIN, C. Carmina Figurata Graeca. Hanover: Janeck, 1886.

HARRIS, W. V. On the applicability of the concept of class in Roman History. In: YUGE, T.; DOI, M. (Ed.). Forms of Control and Subordination in Antiquitity. Tóquio: E. J. Brill, 1988. p. 598-610.

HAYEK, F. A. von The uses of knowledge. American Economic Review, p. 525-540, 1940.

HERESCU, N. J. Sur le sens érotique de sedere. Glotta, v. 38, p. 125-134, 1969.

HILL, C. History and Present. Londres: South Place Ethical Society, 1989.

HOBSON, D. W. House and household in Roman Egypt. Yale Classical Studies, v. 28, p. 211-229, 1985.

HODDER, I. Styte as historical quality in art history. In: CONKEY, M.; HASTORF, C. (ed.). The uses of style in Archaeology. Cambridge: CUP, 1990. p. 44-51.

HOGGART, R. The uses of literacy. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1986.

HOWKIKNS, A. Labour history and the rural poor. 1850-1980, Rural History, Economy, Society, Culture, v. 1, n. 1, p. 113-122, 1990.

JOHN, C. Sex or symbol? Erotic images os Greece and Rome. Londres: British Museum Publications, 1982.

LAGOPOULOS, A. P. Historical Materialism, Semiotics and Urban Space: Towards a Social Semiotics of Urban Texts. Ars Semeiotica, v. 8, n. 3/4, p. 253-268, 1985.

LAGOPOULOS, A. P. Sign conceplions in architecture and the fine arts in ancient Greece and Rome. Tessalonica: manuscrito inédito.

LISSBERGER, E. Das Fortleben der roemischen Elegiker in den Carmina epigraphica. Tuebingen: E. Goebelin, 1934.

MACDONALO, A. H. Theme and style in Roman historiography. In: ALONSQ-NUNEZ, J. M. (ed). Geschichtsbild und Geschichtsdenken im Altertum. Darmstadt: W. B., 1991. p. 220-238.

MACMULLEN, R. Roman social relations, 50 BC to AD 284. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.

MACMULLEN, R. Changes in lhe Roman Empire. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1990.

MATTEWS, T. Roman life and society. In: GRIFFIN, J.; MURRAY, O. (ed.). The Roman Wor1d. Oxford: OUP, 1990. p. 338-360.

MELLY, G. The writting on the wal1. Londres: Elmtree Books, 1976.

NICOLET, C. Rendre a Cesar. Economie et societé dans la Rome Antique. Paris: Gallimard, 1988.

ORSTED, P. Roman imperial economy and Romanization. Copenhagen: Mueseum Tuscutanum Press, 1985.

PERRIN, Y. Peinture et société à Rome: question de sociologie, sociologie de l’art, sociologie de la perception. Mélanges Pierre Lévêque, v. 3, p. 313-342, 1989.

PIGNATARI, D. Teoria de poesia concreta. São Paulo: Invenção, 1965.

PISANI, V. Su um graffito pompeiano. Parola del Passato, v. 28, p. 213-215, 1973.

POLLITT, J. J. The art of Rome c. 753 BC-AO 333. Sources and Documents. Cambridge: CUP, 1989.

RODENWALDT, G. The transition to late-classical art. In: Cambridge Ancient History 12: The Imperial Crisis and Recovery A. D. 193-324. Cambridge, 1939. p. 545-565.

ROSENBERG, B. Was there a popular culture in the Middle Ages? Journal of Popular Culture, v. 14, n. 1, p. 149-154, 1980.

ROSTOVTZEFF, M. Die hellenistisch-roemische Architekturlanschaft, Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archaeologischen Institut. Roemische Abteiling, v. 26, p. 1185-1911, 1911.

ROSTOVTZEFF, M. Ancient decorative wall-painting. Journal of Hellenic Studies, v. 39, p. 144-163, 1919.

ROUVERET, A. Histoire et imaginaire de la peinture ancienne (V s. av. J.C. - 1 s. ap. J.C.). Roma: École Francaise de Rome, 1989.

ROWLANDS, M. Objectivity and subjectivity in Archaeology. In: SPRIGGS, M. (ed). Marxist perspectives in archaeology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983. p. 108-113.

SACKETT, J. R. Style and Ethnicity in Archaeology: The Case for Isochretism. In: CONKEY, M.; HASTORF, C. (ed.). The Uses of Style in Archaelogy. Cambridge: CUP, 1990. p. 32-43.

SANTIAGO, S. Paulistas e mineiros, Revista de Cultura Vozes, v. 71, n. 1, p. 39-46, 1977.

SCHEFOLD, K. La peinture pompéienne. Essai sur l’evolution de sa signification. Bruxelas: Latomus, 1972.

SCOBIE, A. Slums, Sanitation and Mortality in the Roman World. Klio, v. 68, p. 399-433, 1986.

SEBILLOT, P. Le Folklore. Paris: Garnier, 1913.

SEGAL, L. Socialism, Feminism and Future. New Left Review, v. 185, p. 81-91, 1991.

STOCKTON, D. The founding of the Empire. in: BORDMAN, J.; GRIFFIN, J.; MURRAY, O. (Ed.). The Roman World. Oxford: OUP, 1990. 121-149.

TELES, G. M. O nome da poesia concreta. Revista de Cultura, v. 71, n. 1, p. 19-22, 1977.

TRIGGER, B. G. Hyperrelativism, Responsability, and the Social Sciences, Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, v. 26, n. 5, p. 776-797, 1989.

VEYNE, P. A homossexualidade em Roma. In: ARIÉS P.; BÉJIN, A. (ed.). Sexualidades ocidentais. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1986. p. 39-49.

VILLE, G. La gladiature en Occident des origines à la mort de Domitien. Paris: De Boccard, 1981.

WALICKI, A. From Stalinism to post-communist pluralism: the case of Pland, New Left Review, v. 185, p. 93-121, 1991.

WALLACE-HADRILL, A. Roman Arches and Greek Honours: The Language of Power at Rome. Procedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, v. 216, p. 143-181, 1990.

WENDEL, C. Ueberlieferung und Entstehung der Theocritsscholien. Berlim: Weidmannische, 1920.

WHEELER, M. Roman Art and Architecture. Londres: Thames & Hudson, 1989.

WHITE, J. Perspectiva in Ancient Drawing and Painting. Londres: S. Press of Hall Studies, 1957.

WILAMOWITZ, U. V. Die Greschischen Technopaegnia. Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archaeologischen Institut, v. 14, p. 51-59, 1989.

WILSON, R. J. A. Roman Art and Architecture. In: BORDMAN, J.; GRIFFIN, T.; MURRAY, O. (Ed.). The Roman World. Oxford: OUP, 1990. p. 361-400.

WOOD, E. M. Peasant-Citizen and Slave. The Foundations of Athenian Democracy. Londres: Verso, 1989.

WOOLEN, P. Scenes from the Future: Komar & Melamid. New Left Review, v. 185, p. 68-80, 1991.

Downloads

Publicado

1992-12-20

Como Citar

Funari, P. P. A. (1992). A caricatura gráfica e o ethos popular em Pompéia. Classica - Revista Brasileira De Estudos Clássicos, 117–138. https://doi.org/10.24277/classica.v0i0.823

Edição

Seção

Artigos