Aeschylus' geographic imagination

Peter W. Rose

Resumo


After reviewing various scholars’ accounts of geographical references in Aeschylus’ plays, some seeing exoticism, some serious geographic knowledge reflecting Ionian science, some focused exclusively on the opposition of Greek and barbarian, I argue that regardless of what one might posit as Aeschylus’ intentions, the sheer quantity of geographic allusions are best understood as contributing to the formation of an imperialist consciousness by representing the non-Athenian Mediterranean world, some of it already under the control of Athens, as inherently fascinating.

Palavras-chave


Geography; barbarian; orientalism; map; imperialism.

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


BACON, Helen H. Barbarians in Greek Tragedy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961.

BERNAND, André. Leçon de civilization. Paris: Fayard, 1994.

BUNBURY, E. H. A History of Ancient Geography: Among the Greeks and Romans From the Earliest Ages Till the Fall of the Roman Empire. New York: Dover, [1959] 1883. 2 v.

CALAME, Claude. Parcours généalogique et constructions spatiales: Eschyle et les représentations du monde habité. In: Généalogies mythiques: Actes du VIIe Colloque du Centre de recherches mythologiques de l’Université de Paris X. Paris: Université de Paris X, 1995. p.283-297.

FOSTER, John Bellamy. The Rediscovery of Imperialism. Monthly Review, v. 54, n. 6, p. 1-16, 2002.

FRAENKEL, Eduard. Aeschylus Agamemnon, edited with a commentary. 1950. 3 v.

GODLEWSKA, Anne; SMITH, Neil (Ed.). Geography and Empire. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.

GREENWOOD, Sam Lee. Geographical Allusion in Attic Tragedy. 1938. Dissertation (PhD) – University of Chicago, Chicago, 1938.

GRIFFITH, Mark (Ed.). Aeschylus Prometheus Bound. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1983.

GRIFFITH, Mark. The Authenticity of the Prometheus Bound. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.

HALL, Edith. Inventing the Barbarian: Greek Self-Definition through Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.

HARVEY, David. The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.

HERINGTON, C. J. The Author of the Prometheus Bound. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1970.

IRELAND, S. Aeschylus. Greece and Rome: New Surveys in the Classics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, v. 18, 1986.

MALINOWSKI, Bronislaw. Myth in Primitive Psychology. Westport, Conn.: Negro University Press, 1926.

NICOLET, Claude. Space, Geography, and Politics in the Early Roman Empire. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1991.

PELLING, Christopher. Aeschylus. Persae and History. In: ______. (Ed.). Greek Tragedy and the Historian. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.

PODLECKI, Anthony J. The Political Background of Aeschylean Tragedy. London: Duckworth, 1999.

REHM, Rush. The Play of Space: Spatial Transformation in Greek Tragedy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.

ROMM, James S. The Edges of the Earth in Ancient Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.

ROSE, Peter W. Sons of the Gods, Children of Earth: Ideology and Literary Form in Ancient Greece. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992.

ROSE, Peter W. The Politics of the Trilogy Form: Lucía, The Oresteia, and The Godfather. Film Historia, v. 5, n. 2-3, p. 93-116, 1995.

ROSENBLOOM, David. Myth, History, and Hegemony in Aeschylus. In: GOFF, Barbara (Ed.). History, Tragedy, theory: Dialogues on Athenian Drama. Austin: Univeristy of Texas Press, 1995.

SAID, Edward W. Orientalism. New York: Random House, 1978.

SAÏD, Suzanne. Sophiste et tyran: ou le problème du Prométhée enchaîné. Paris: Klinsieck, 1985.

STE. CROIX, G.E.M. de. The Origins of the Peloponnesian War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1972.

THOMSON, James Oliver. History of Ancient Geography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1948.

VASOUNIA, Phiroze. The Gift of the Nile: Hellenizing Egypt from Aeschylus to Alexander. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001.

WEST, Martin. Studies in Aeschylus. Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner, 1990.

WEST, Stephanie. Alternative Arabai: A Note on Prometheus Vinctus 420-4. Hermes, v. 125, p. 374-479, 1997.

WILLIAMS, Raymond. Afterward. In: DOLLIMORE, Jonathan; SINFIELD, Alan (Ed.). Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985.

WIMSATT, W. K. The Verbal Icon. Lexington: The University of Kentucky Press, 1954.

ZEITLIN, Froma. The Politics of Eros in the Danaid Trilogy of Aeschylus. In: HEXTER, Ralph; SELDEN, Daniel (Ed.). Innovations of Antiquity. New York: Routledge, 1992.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.14195/2176-6436_22-2_8

Métricas do artigo

Carregando Métricas ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.




Direitos autorais 2013 Peter W. Rose

Licença Creative Commons
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.

 

 Classica está licenciada sob a Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional